- Everything (84)
- Model letter (0)
- Practice note (0)
- Precedent (0)
- Uploads (0)
- Tools (1)
- Article (0)
- Case note (34)
- News (16)
- Polls (0)
- CPD course (0)
- CPD diploma (0)
- Training note (0)
- Webinar (3)
- Downloads (0)
- Form (1)
- Judgment (28)
- Practice direction (0)
- Rule (0)
- SI (0)
- Statute (0)
- International regs (0)
- Extracted from Ministry of Justice annual report News, 12/01/2017, free
- Husband's application to appeal a non-molestation order against him and an occupation order in respect of the parties' matrimonial home. Application dismissed. Judgment, 05/12/2016, free
- Appeal against order stating that the appellant had only a 20% beneficial interest in the former family home. Appeal dismissed Judgment, 26/07/2016, free
- Appeal against a ruling that the circumstances in which the ex-partner of the owner of a property had paid £500 a month for several years as a contribution towards the expenses of running and maintaining the property gave rise to a proprietary estoppel. The appeal was dismissed. Judgment, 05/04/2016, free
- Application for declaratory relief pursuant to s 17 of the Married Women's Property Act 1882 where the applicant claimed that she was the sole beneficial owner of 2 of the 4 properties the couple owned and that she had an 82% interest in another of the properties. Judgment, 18/03/2016, free
- Figures released in annual survey of households and families produced by the Office for National Statistics News, 06/11/2015, free
- Appeal against finding that a former cohabitee had a 25% interest in a property that was owned by the appellant but from where the respondent runs a business. Appeal allowed. Judgment, 14/09/2015, free
- Appeal concerning joint tenancy following breakdown of cohabiting couple's relationship. Judgment, 15/07/2015, free
- Appeal against orders dismissing claims by a former partner that she should have a share in 3 properties bought in the other partners name. Appeal dismissed because, broadly, the Court of Appeal's powers to challenge findings of fact are limited, there was no express agreement and there was no detriment. Judgment, 29/04/2015, free
- Appeal against finding that the appellant had only a 25% beneficial interest in a property in which she had lived unmarried with her partner for over 33 years and that was now subject of possession proceedings. She also appealed against decision that her share be paid out of remaining proceeds of sale. Both appeals dismissed. Judgment, 10/02/2015, free