- Everything (1546)
- Model letter (0)
- Practice note (6)
- Precedent (0)
- Uploads (0)
- Tools (5)
- Article (10)
- Case note (519)
- News (98)
- Polls (0)
- CPD course (0)
- CPD diploma (0)
- Training note (0)
- Webinar (67)
- Downloads (0)
- Form (20)
- Judgment (773)
- Practice direction (1)
- Rule (0)
- SI (0)
- Statute (0)
- International regs (0)
- Roberts J considered a Schedule 1 claim in circumstances where the father was worth c. £190 million and had a gross income of £3.8 million per annum. Case note, 26/03/2021, free
- Listed before Mostyn J for final disposal was an application for maintenance under s.27 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (“MCA 1973”) made by the wife (“W”), along with a Judgment Summons issued by W, and an application made by the husband (“H”) to set aside, or stay enforcement of, an interim order for maintenance and legal services provision. This judgment follows the judgment of the Supreme Court from July 2020, Villiers v Villiers [2020] UKSC 30. A summary of that judgment can be found here. Case note, 19/03/2021, free
- Roberts J considered an application made for a financial remedy in circumstances where there was significant inherited wealth and several offshore trust structures. Case note, 04/03/2021, free
- Cohen J heard applications made by both husband and wife following the handing down of judgment after a final hearing between the parties in March 2020. He gave two separate judgments. Case note, 25/02/2021, free
- Cohen J considered a claim made under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 following a divorce in Russia. Case note, 18/02/2021, free
- Nicholas Cusworth QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, considered claims for interim maintenance and for a Legal Services Provision Order. Case note, 11/02/2021, free
- The Court of Appeal considered the proper interpretation of a consent order made in financial remedy proceedings. Case note, 04/02/2021, free
- Mostyn J heard an appeal against an order which had capitalised child maintenance payments. Case note, 28/01/2021, free
- Cobb J was concerned with interim applications made under Schedule 1 to the Children Act 1989 in respect of a child who was just three weeks old. Case note, 07/12/2020, free
- Gwynneth Knowles J considered the application of the slip rule where a court order made in 2017 had referred incorrectly in one paragraph to the ‘applicant’ instead of to the ‘respondent’. The order had consequently erroneously set out that the husband was to stop paying periodical payments to the wife upon his own remarriage, rather than upon the remarriage of the wife. Case note, 19/11/2020, free