Family Law Hub

Judgment, published: 16/09/2015

Items referring to this

• CA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and EG (CSM) (Child support - tribunal practice) [2017] UKUT 9 (AAC)
  Circumstances when an anonymity order should be granted in child support decisions Judgment, 22/03/2017, free
• DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam)
  Husband was asking for an adjournment of this "extremely simple [financial remedy] case" which was refused. Mr Justice Mostyn explains his reasoning for anonymisation of financial remedy cases and ordered that the media should not identify the parties. Judgment, 16/09/2015, free
• H v A (No.2) [2015] EWHC 2630 (Fam)
  Judgment concerning whether a previous judgment in these complex private children law and related criminal proceedings should remain publicly available in the form originally published on Bailii even though it was possible to identify the parties using other information available on the internet. Judgment, 17/09/2015, free
• Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 49
  An anonymity order dated 30 June 2011 had been imposed following financial provision proceedings. The wife applied for the anonymity order to be extended or, alternatively, for the imposition of a fresh anonymity order to cover recent financial provision proceedings. The court held that in the particular circumstances of this case, such balancing exercise, if any, as the court was required to conduct, clearly came down in favour of the press and other media. A decision which refused to impose reporting or anonymity restrictions was a proportionate response to such entitlement as the wife may have to privacy under article 8. The application was therefore refused. Judgment, 08/02/2017, free
• Norman v Norman [2017] EWCA Civ 49
  In a tweet: Unsuccessful application by a wife for a reporting restriction order in the CoA Case note, 22/03/2017, members only