Family Law Hub

Bush v Bush [2008] EWCA Civ 865

Judgment, published: 31/12/2008

Items referring to this

  • The court ruled that it did have jurisdiction in relation to proceedings issued by the mother under the inherent jurisdiction concerning two children where the mother alleged that the father had removed their passports thus preventing them from returning to the UK from the UAE. Judgment, 16/08/2017, free
  • Father's application to enforce a contact order in circumstances where the order stated that the children should remain habitually resident in the UK despite living in Spain with their mother. The court ruled that the order was not enforceable. Judgment, 09/07/2015, free
  • In a tweet: Judgment declining jurisdiction in respect of two children habitually resident in Bosnia. In brief: Mr Justice Bodey found that the issues could and should have been raised before the Bosnian court, where it was accepted that the children were habitually resident. The idea that jurisdiction could be established for dealing with a one-off urgent situation (in this case the mother’s application to relocate to Serbia in two days’ time) was undesirable – “one does not dip in and out of jurisdiction”. Judgment, 31/10/2016, free
  • Appeal against a decision that the English court had jurisdiction to hear proceedings in relation to the child where the judge ruled that the child had habitual residence in the UK despite having lived abroad since before February 2013. Munby P ruled that the judge had been wrong about the question of habitual residence and on his ruling that the mother had demonstrated an "unequivocal" acceptance of the jurisdiction. The order was set aside. Judgment, 16/12/2014, free

Published: 31/12/2008


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item