Family Law Hub

NB v Haringey [2011] EWHC 3544 (Fam)

Judgment, published: 31/12/2011

Items referring to this

  • Sir Peter Singer's High Court judgment in which he has to grapple with 2 novel issues in a case involving proceedings in the UK and America. The M had brought the child to the UK after the American court ruled that he was habitually resident in the UK. This was subsequently overturned and the M ordered to return the child to F in America. The main issues were: 1) did the decision of the US court have the consequence of rendering the removal ''wrongful'' for the purposes of Article 3 of the Hague Convention?; 2) If the removal of the child was not ''wrongful'', then did the US appellate decision and the consequential US order requiring the mother to return the child mean that she had wrongfully retained the child away from the USA? Or was the child's habitual residence in England? Judgment, 11/09/2013, free

Published: 31/12/2011


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item