Family Law Hub

Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878

Judgment, published: 31/12/2006

Items referring to this

  • Judgment from The President concerning publication of judgments and applications for Reporting Restriction Orders. Although this particular judgment arose out of care proceedings, the guidance has wider application to all family cases. Judgment, 08/07/2016, free
  • Circumstances when an anonymity order should be granted in child support decisions Judgment, 22/03/2017, free
  • Judgment concerning whether a previous judgment in these complex private children law and related criminal proceedings should remain publicly available in the form originally published on Bailii even though it was possible to identify the parties using other information available on the internet. Judgment, 17/09/2015, free
  • A case heard by the President, Munby J, who granted a reporting restriction order, contra mundum, to prevent the publication of details of a child who was subject to care proceedings. The order prevented the naming, but not publication of images, of the child, nor did it prevent the naming of the social workers involved in the case. Judgment, 06/09/2013, free
  • The application for permission to appeal against a RRO in respect of proceedings relating to a boy whose mother believes is gender dysphoric / identifies as female was refused. Judgment, 03/11/2016, free
  • Follow up to the judgment in J (A Minor) [2016] EWHC 2430 (Fam) to consider whether or to what extent that judgment should be placed in the public domain. Judgment, 21/10/2016, free
  • The husband's appeal against the discharge of the Court of Appeal's reporting restriction order was dismissed. Judgment, 18/10/2017, free

Published: 31/12/2006

Copyright 

Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.

Disclaimer

The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item