Judgment, published: 22/07/2008
Items referring to this
- Wife's application for financial provision despite the existence of a post-nuptial agreement which she claimed was "vitiated by duress; alternatively unconscionable conduct such as undue pressure (falling short of duress); alternatively other unworthy conduct, such as exploitation of a dominant position to secure unfair advantage". The wife's case was rejected, the judge finding that the PNA had been entered into freely by the wife, and with full appreciation of its implications. Judgment, 26/03/2015, free
- Judgment, 17/12/2008, free
- Judgment, 11/03/2011, free
- Appeal by husband in financial remedy proceedings against decision that the matrimonial assets should be shared equally on the grounds that he had made a special contribution. Appeal dismissed as the trial judge could not be found to be wrong. Judgment, 13/04/2017, free
Published: 22/07/2008
Share