Judgment, published: 04/04/2007
Items referring to this
- Judgment, 25/01/2010, free
- Case note, 12/07/2007, members only
- Judgment, 21/01/2009, free
- Judgment, 18/06/2009, free
- Judgment, 28/04/2010, free
- Judgment, 29/01/2008, free
- The court ruled that an earning capacity was not capable of being a matrimonial asset to which the sharing principle applies. Also, the court rejected the argument that the wife's capital, apart from her housing need, should be preserved and should not be used in any way to meet her income needs. Judgment, 13/04/2018, free
Published: 04/04/2007
Share