The judge had been asked by the wife to reconsider his conclusions on the grounds that there was a significant and material omission in the figures.
This content is only available to members
If you are a current member log on now.
If you are not a member contact Class Legal on 01652 652222 or email them via info@classlegal.com to get started.
Case note, published: 02/10/2019
Topics
See also
- MacDonald J initially concluded that the judge's award exceeded the wife's housing need. However, following the circulation of his draft judgment, his attention was drawn to a significant material omission in the figures that had underpinned those conclusions, and he decided that the manner in which the judge chose to structure the disposition was not after all wrong, and the husband's appeal was dismissed. Judgment, 10/04/2019, free
Published: 02/10/2019
Share