In a tweet: Big money case which considers matrimonial and non-matrimonial property as well as special contributions OR HC rejects the formulaic approach used in Jones v Jones in favour of exercising broad judicial discretion
This content is only available to members
If you are a current member log on now.
If you are not a member contact Class Legal on 01652 652222 or email them via info@classlegal.com to get started.
Case note, published: 14/09/2016
Topics
See also
- High value financial remedy case in which the judge had to decide whether shares that were owned by the husband before cohabitation and subsequently marriage were matrimonial or non-matrimonial assets. The judge held that the only fair way to treat the remaining pre-existing shares (and the others which had been used to purchase investment properties) was to treat them as to half as the personal non-matrimonial property of the husband, and as to half as the matrimonial property of the parties to be evenly shared. Judgment, 22/03/2016, free
Published: 14/09/2016
Share