Philip Cayford QC and Simon Calhaem of 29 Bedford Row, who represented Mrs Wyatt in the Supreme Court, are joined by members of the Mills & Reeve family law team to review and discuss the issues raised by the case and the impact of the Law Lords decision on practice.
This content is only available to members
If you are a current member log on now.
If you are not a member contact Class Legal on 01652 652222 or email them via info@classlegal.com to get started.
Webcast, published: 18/03/2015
Topics
Downloads
- Wyatt v Vince powerpoint slides.ppt (137 KB)
See also
- Costs case in which an order had been made for the H to pay the W's solicitors so that she could bring her claim for financial provision. The issue here was whether she should repay the money having lost her claim. Judgment, 25/07/2013, free
- Ex-husband's appeal against the dismissal of his application to strike out his ex-wife's claim for financial remedy, 19 years after they were divorced, and the granting of her application for an A v A order to finance the claim. Judgment, 08/05/2013, free
- Appeal against decision to strike out wife's financial remedy application as an abuse of process where there had been significant delay. Appeal allowed. Judgment, 11/03/2015, free
Published: 18/03/2015
Share