Family Law Hub

Wyatt v Vince: what it means in practice

Philip Cayford QC and Simon Calhaem of 29 Bedford Row, who represented Mrs Wyatt in the Supreme Court, are joined by members of the Mills & Reeve family law team to review and discuss the issues raised by the case and the impact of the Law Lords decision on practice.

This content is only available to members

If you are a current member log on now.

If you are not a member contact Class Legal on 01652 652222 or email them via to get started.

Webcast, published: 18/03/2015



See also

  • Costs case in which an order had been made for the H to pay the W's solicitors so that she could bring her claim for financial provision. The issue here was whether she should repay the money having lost her claim. Judgment, 25/07/2013, free
  • Ex-husband's appeal against the dismissal of his application to strike out his ex-wife's claim for financial remedy, 19 years after they were divorced, and the granting of her application for an A v A order to finance the claim. Judgment, 08/05/2013, free
  • Appeal against decision to strike out wife's financial remedy application as an abuse of process where there had been significant delay. Appeal allowed. Judgment, 11/03/2015, free

Published: 18/03/2015


Copyright in the original legal material published on the Family Law Hub is vested in Mills & Reeve LLP (as per date of publication shown on screen) unless indicated otherwise.


The Family Law Hub website relates to the legal position in England Wales and all of the material within it has been prepared with the aim of providing key information only and does not constitute legal advice in relation to any particular situation. While Mills & Reeve LLP aims to ensure that the information is correct at the date on which it is added to the website, the legal position can change frequently, and content will not always be updated following any relevant changes. You therefore acknowledge and agree that Mills & Reeve LLP and its members and employees accept no liability whatsoever in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss or damage caused by or arising directly or indirectly in connection with any use or reliance on the contents of our website except to the extent that such liability cannot be excluded by law.

Bookmark this item